I disagree . I think it's great that a 1/56 scale Matilda will be released in plastic. The kit only has two options, a 2 pounder and a 3"close support howitzer, but what other options would be needed to wargame with? There were only six options listed on the previous page, I think two out of six options aren't too bad.
I too think it is good that there is a Matilda in 1/56, it is just such a missed opportunity to be able to cover France 1940, North Africa and the Far East in a single kit. The key disappointment for me is there is no mention of engine options and no Vickers MG. I can understand there not being a high heels option, and the bustle is not much of a problem, but the difference in the external exhaust is as noticeable as the difference between an M4, an M4A2 and an M4A3 engine deck.
I get the feeling that Warlord's procurement methodology has not altered since the days of plastic card and milliput, they ask a supplier to design a model for a fixed price. They might supply some standard parts (YMMV) but they leave the supplier to their own devices. Once they receive the model, it is the final thing, no possibility of revision.
Rubicon has the advantage that it is an in-house development process (with us looking over their shoulders ^___^).
There is no obvious improvement plan in their models. As Ripley pointed out, there are a number of options for the Char B kit, there are none listed for the Matilda.
With the 80th anniversary next year, it seems stupid to not have a suitable option for France 1940 in the design spec.
It does make me think twice about buying the Bumper Box of Matildas, and waiting for the single box.
