Poll

Which US Tank Destroyer you want us to make?

(1) M10 Wolverine / 17pdr SP Achilles
40 (38.1%)
(2) M10 Wolverine / M36 Jackson
12 (11.4%)
(3) M36 Jackson /17pdr SP Achilles
4 (3.8%)
(4) M18 Hellcat
49 (46.7%)

Total Members Voted: 104

Author Topic: Proposed Project: US Tank Destroyer  (Read 30023 times)

Rubicon Models

  • Administrator
  • Colonel
  • *****
  • Posts: 3,863
    • View Profile
Proposed Project: US Tank Destroyer
« on: December 08, 2014, 06:50:26 pm »


Which one do you prefer?  There are several possibilities:

(1) M10 Wolverine / 17pdr SP Achilles
(2) M10 Wolverine / M36 Jackson
(3) M36 Jackson /17pdr SP Achilles
(4) M18 Hellcat

Vote now or give comments!!


Some Background History:

By far the most common US design was the 3in Gun Motor Carriage M10 (Wolverine), later supplemented by the 90 mm Gun Motor Carriage M36 (Jackson) - both based on the M4 Sherman hull and powertrain - and the 76 mm Gun Motor Carriage M18 (Hellcat), based on a unique hull and powertrain design, with a slight visual resemblance to what was used for the later M24 Chaffee light tank.

The M18 came closest to the US ideal; the vehicle was very fast, small, and mounted a 76 mm gun in a roofless open turret. The M36 Jackson GMC possessed the only American-origin operational gun that could rival the vaunted 88 mm German ordnance, the 90 mm M3 gun, and the M36 remained in service well after World War II.

;)
« Last Edit: December 08, 2014, 07:08:40 pm by Rubicon Models »

elias.tibbs

  • Corporal
  • **
  • Posts: 422
    • View Profile
Re: Proposed Project: US Tank Destroyer
« Reply #1 on: December 08, 2014, 09:39:53 pm »
Can a multi-tank kit of the m10 and both m36 variants be produced?
"No bastard ever won a war by dying for his country. He won it by making the other poor dumb bastard die for his country."
A (Cam)Bridge Too Far - A UK based Bolt Action Tournament

Rubicon Models

  • Administrator
  • Colonel
  • *****
  • Posts: 3,863
    • View Profile
Re: Proposed Project: US Tank Destroyer
« Reply #2 on: December 08, 2014, 10:06:55 pm »
Can a multi-tank kit of the m10 and both m36 variants be produced?
Need to do a parts count when the basic 3D model is done.  A tank of this size should be a 3 sprue kit, similar to our existing M4A3 kit.  With 2 turrets; yes, it is possible!

;)

Laffe

  • Private
  • *
  • Posts: 96
    • View Profile
    • The Figure Fanatic Blog
Re: Proposed Project: US Tank Destroyer
« Reply #3 on: December 08, 2014, 10:26:31 pm »
I want the 17 pounder Achilles and don't really care if it's an M10 or M36 with it inside the box. I voted for the M10 because I had to vote for something! ;)

tinfish

  • Cadet
  • *
  • Posts: 4
    • View Profile
Re: Proposed Project: US Tank Destroyer
« Reply #4 on: December 09, 2014, 01:33:54 am »
Voted for M18, pretty vehicle.

Pinky

  • Captain
  • ****
  • Posts: 1,726
    • View Profile
Re: Proposed Project: US Tank Destroyer
« Reply #5 on: December 09, 2014, 01:41:00 am »
I voted for the M10/Achilles.  I think that covers two important vehicles, and you also give both the British and the US players a new tank.  I suspect the open-topped turret will require more parts, so providing 2 completely different turrets might be a stretch.

elias.tibbs

  • Corporal
  • **
  • Posts: 422
    • View Profile
Re: Proposed Project: US Tank Destroyer
« Reply #6 on: December 09, 2014, 01:52:45 am »
Can a multi-tank kit of the m10 and both m36 variants be produced?
Need to do a parts count when the basic 3D model is done.  A tank of this size should be a 3 sprue kit, similar to our existing M4A3 kit.  With 2 turrets; yes, it is possible!

;)

That would be pretty awesome. As far as I'm aware (and it's probably wrong), the only main visible difference between the M10 and M36 was the turret and a few cosmetic things.

That'd be two kits in one. As much as I'd love to have the M18, I think the M10/M36 combi kit makes more sense for you guys at the moment. More potential audience for a single kit = more potential cash flow from a similar budget.

You could potentially put the M36B2 in there too (M36 with a .30cal bow gun), three kits in one. Even better!
« Last Edit: December 09, 2014, 02:58:51 am by Spinfire »
"No bastard ever won a war by dying for his country. He won it by making the other poor dumb bastard die for his country."
A (Cam)Bridge Too Far - A UK based Bolt Action Tournament

S for Shrek

  • Cadet
  • *
  • Posts: 3
    • View Profile
Re: Proposed Project: US Tank Destroyer
« Reply #7 on: December 09, 2014, 02:26:50 am »
M10 Wolverine/Achilles, please.

Budy

  • Cadet
  • *
  • Posts: 2
    • View Profile
Re: Proposed Project: US Tank Destroyer
« Reply #8 on: December 09, 2014, 05:14:59 pm »
Hellcat is awesome for Bolt Action players!! 

Hayden

  • Cadet
  • *
  • Posts: 3
    • View Profile
Re: Proposed Project: US Tank Destroyer
« Reply #9 on: December 09, 2014, 07:14:14 pm »
no hellcat is awesome for Bolt Action American players ;D

zigoR

  • Guest
Re: Proposed Project: US Tank Destroyer
« Reply #10 on: December 09, 2014, 08:36:41 pm »
Right...
Hellcat is HELL for all others ;)

Monxito

  • Cadet
  • *
  • Posts: 1
    • View Profile
Re: Proposed Project: US Tank Destroyer
« Reply #11 on: December 09, 2014, 10:35:42 pm »
Hellcat !!  Hellcat !!

Cat

  • Private
  • *
  • Posts: 58
    • View Profile
    • Goblinhall
Re: Proposed Project: US Tank Destroyer
« Reply #12 on: December 10, 2014, 12:06:20 am »
M10 w/17pdr gun and mantlet please.  Oh, Canada!

Gooffy

  • Cadet
  • *
  • Posts: 1
    • View Profile
Re: Proposed Project: US Tank Destroyer
« Reply #13 on: December 11, 2014, 03:18:08 am »
I voted for Hellcat. It's cool tank destroyer, it looks very nice and it have interesting rules for Bolt action game. M10 Wolverine  is already offered by Warlord Games  8)

Garga

  • Cadet
  • *
  • Posts: 33
    • View Profile
Re: Proposed Project: US Tank Destroyer
« Reply #14 on: December 13, 2014, 05:46:33 pm »
I like you will do a tank destroyer but I would prefer you cover models that do not exist like the m4a3e8 or the jumbo... Or priest... The blitzkrieg miniatures us doing them in resin.