We are
really surprised to see a heated debate about our company direction as to what project to tackle in the future.
As stated, this is simply a
pilot study to see what we can do with our existing products to create new ones
with minimal efforts. For example, this "vehicle" (disregard of its original) is a
NEW product by using a
SINGLE piece component (in this case, a
new hull) and combining
two existing products to create. We just do not see what is wrong with this approach. With similar product in our future range, we can combine a
Panzer IV and a
FlaK 36 to create an
8.8cm FlaK 36 auf PzKpfw IV Ausf H by creating a
new upper hull. Is this also not good?
With the same logic, we can create deep wading gear, dozer blades, mine flail, rocket launcher (T34 Calliope), and extra amours for the M4 Sherman range. This also applies to combining other new and upcoming products (AA/AT guns) to create new tank variants too!
Is this a wrong approach to help increase our product range for the community? All these require minimal efforts. Might be not common vehicles, but still in demand for late war scenarios. Also, these will definitely not affect our normal production schedule as these minor projects will be handled by trainee staff, and produced in limited quantity. Other companies like Forgeworld had been doing this with GW plastic range for years, we are no different in that respect.
Looking forward for more comments on this subject?
