Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - tyroflyer

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 16
1
EWG and Rubicon Models, a wonderful combination!

2
Excellent stuff. Now if we could only go back and do a Panzer IV Ausf C to accompany the Panzer 111 Ausf E. Greedy I know.

3
Work In Progress / Re: SdKfz 10 - SdKfz 10 3D Prototype 191122
« on: November 23, 2019, 04:08:27 pm »
Excellent Info EWG. An Ausf A please Rubicon.

4
That does look good. Nice choice.

5
Well done Rubicon

6
Wish Lists / Re: Your next British tank... which one?
« on: June 29, 2019, 10:57:55 am »
I'll add my support to EWG's suggestions of Valentine and Cruiser A13.

7
I shouldn't like it ………….but I do!

8
Will be interested to see what the Panzer IV variants you (Rubicon) have in mind. Disappointed to read early war vehicles are difficult to do.

9
Sympathetic to your point of view Tracks. As my wargaming interests are varied I can't envisage building many WWII armies. I currently desire vehicles that are compatible with the Polish campaign and the German/Russian armies of the period. Bit of a niche perhaps but there are too many things to do and no time to do them all. It must be very difficult to please everyone as we all have different projects in mind.

I agree entirely long range weapons such as the 155mm howitzer shouldn't have any place in a skirmish game unless it's an objective marker or perhaps part of an ambushed convoy in some scenario. Any rules that think these weapons make sense in a skirmish game has missed the mark in my view. On that basis I wouldn't prioritise them if I had any say in it. I wouldn't be interested in fantasy or one of vehicles either.

No doubt Rubicon will make heaps of money producing big guns and 'orrible imaginary things because they understand their customers better than I do!   

10
Work In Progress / Re: RESIN Project - LCM(3) - Packaging 190110
« on: January 11, 2019, 07:30:53 am »
Looks very nice but I suspect the price is going to put it out of reach of most wargamers, unless they just want to put one on the shelf and admire it. An invasion fleet might require a mortgage on the house!

11
Well done Rubicon. I don't know if the discussion here triggered this response but a very good solution.

12
Work In Progress / Re: VW Type 166 Schwimmwagen - eDrawings 181201
« on: December 02, 2018, 06:50:34 am »
I've gone off the idea of a swimmer. Not practical for a wargame table without cutting the occupants in half!

13
Work In Progress / Re: VW Type 166 Schwimmwagen - eDrawings 181201
« on: December 01, 2018, 03:55:50 pm »
Nice. How about one swimming?

14
Work In Progress / Re: Digital Sculpts - Soviet Winter Infantry 181124
« on: November 25, 2018, 07:04:25 am »
I think they are very nice. Can anyone tell me how early they can be fielded and be historically accurate?

15
Work In Progress / Re: Digital Sculpts - Generic Horse Template 181116
« on: November 18, 2018, 12:44:43 pm »
I agree entirely EWG, with your observation about the importance of horses in WWII. Just not convinced Rubicon can do this better than more traditional figure manufacturers. Perhaps I'll change my mind when I see a painted example.

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 16