Author Topic: Codename: Sherman 2016 - 3pc Differential Housing Conversion 210122  (Read 300697 times)

Rubicon Models

  • Administrator
  • Colonel
  • *****
  • Posts: 3,862
    • View Profile
Re: Codename: Sherman 16 - Updated 160425
« Reply #90 on: April 26, 2016, 01:55:40 am »
It looks like you've made up your mind on most of the features of your Sherman project. On feature choice number five, I'd suggest the T-48 rubber chevron track. It was the most used track in Europe. The T-54E1 that you talked about is the most common steel track. The easiest to mold would be either the T-41 or T-51, as the rubber pads are plain.

Nothing is final until we start the project.  Right now is data collection, that's why we posted what we think we will do... subject to comments and feedback.

Because of the one piece track design, there are limitations on how the track pattern will show up on a two-part mould.  Consider the scale of the model, there is no signification differences on the T48 and T54E1 with our current design method.  Being that said, we are now switching to side-sliding moulds (3 part mould) to create track patterns on the front end of the track - about 4 to 8 tracks with patterns in the front will be visible. The rest of the tracks (upper and lower, plus back side) will remain the same as current one piece track - Our thinking is basically only the front is visible, other views/areas will be blocked by the upper hull anyway.


On choice number seven, you only leave two choices, unfortunately.  Really, only one, as I believe the T80E5 was made postwar. Have you considered etched brass for the face of the T-66 tracks? Maybe not the entire track, but just the cast pattern detail that meets the ground? I seem to remember a company that made etched brass track for the Roco Minitanks years ago. Maybe something like that?

Even with the three-part mould method, the T80 pattern will not be very noticeable in our scale.  We are thinking of a resin upgrade kit (with T66 tracks) later when the HVSS option is available.
« Last Edit: April 26, 2016, 10:20:52 am by Rubicon Models »

H0ffmn

  • Corporal
  • **
  • Posts: 279
    • View Profile
Re: Codename: Sherman 16 - Updated 160425
« Reply #91 on: April 26, 2016, 03:43:26 am »
With the slide mold, could you do the same with the back side of the tracks as you plan on doing with the front ? You are correct in that the top or bottom of the track would not be visible.
That would be great if you offered a resin set of T-66 tracks in the future. You could sell them, and with the HVSS suspension as an optional replacement for your current M4A3 kit's suspension

H0ffmn

  • Corporal
  • **
  • Posts: 279
    • View Profile
Re: Codename: Sherman 16 - Updated 160403
« Reply #92 on: April 26, 2016, 07:48:14 am »
I didn't notice it in your earlier drawings,but your 3D prototype has the steel cleat track. If this is for the upgrade to your M4A3 kit, I would suggest that you use the rubber cleated T-48 track instead. It was the most common type on U.S. Shermans in NW Europe
   Uh.....my mistake. The T-54E1 track WAS used on the M4A1 and M4A3 later in WW2. I made the comment while at work, and when I got home i checked my references, specifically Military Miniatures in Review's Modelers Guide to the Sherman.
 Next time, I won't comment until I can check my facts.
          Sorry....

Pinky

  • Captain
  • ****
  • Posts: 1,726
    • View Profile
Re: Codename: Sherman 16 - Updated 160425
« Reply #93 on: April 26, 2016, 09:52:34 am »
Great to hear you're switching to slide moulds for the Sherman tracks - and it'll be fine to just deal with the front and rear track sections. 

I don't have much to add on this; it sounds like a solid list of key components.  It looks as though you're basically focusing on mid-late war variants.

I would prefer that Rubicon not start adding any brass or resin components to their kits.  But separate upgrade sets would be nice, in due course.   

Rubicon Models

  • Administrator
  • Colonel
  • *****
  • Posts: 3,862
    • View Profile
Re: Codename: Sherman 16 - Updated 160425
« Reply #94 on: April 26, 2016, 10:24:01 am »
Great to hear you're switching to slide moulds for the Sherman tracks - and it'll be fine to just deal with the front and rear track sections. 

Unfortunately, our standard length of the sprue and the tracks didn't match, thus only the front detail is possible.

Pinky

  • Captain
  • ****
  • Posts: 1,726
    • View Profile
Re: Codename: Sherman 16 - Updated 160425
« Reply #95 on: April 26, 2016, 12:10:34 pm »
Oh, I missed the fact that it's just the front of the tracks...

ultravanillasmurf

  • Lieutenant
  • ****
  • Posts: 2,305
    • View Profile
    • Blog:
Re: Codename: Sherman 16 - Updated 160425
« Reply #96 on: April 26, 2016, 03:52:22 pm »
Great to hear you're switching to slide moulds for the Sherman tracks - and it'll be fine to just deal with the front and rear track sections. 

Unfortunately, our standard length of the sprue and the tracks didn't match, thus only the front detail is possible.

We will just have to cover the back end of the track with mud....

Rubicon Models

  • Administrator
  • Colonel
  • *****
  • Posts: 3,862
    • View Profile
Re: Codename: Sherman 16 - Updated 160507
« Reply #97 on: May 07, 2016, 02:58:21 pm »
More work had been done on our M4 Sherman project...
This time drawing of the rear exhaust... with and without grille!


Enjoy!
;)

Rubicon Models

  • Administrator
  • Colonel
  • *****
  • Posts: 3,862
    • View Profile
Re: Codename: Sherman 16 - Updated 160523
« Reply #98 on: May 23, 2016, 10:48:18 pm »
Had been almost two weeks without any updates on the M4 project.

This is part of the new 3D Drawings from our ongoing M4 Sherman components project -
T48 tread links with rubber chevron pattern. Still pretty much a work-in-progress stage...
but taking shape!


Enjoy!
;)

H0ffmn

  • Corporal
  • **
  • Posts: 279
    • View Profile
Re: Codename: Sherman 16 - Updated 160523
« Reply #99 on: May 23, 2016, 11:39:24 pm »
The 3D drawing looks great. I can't wait to see the 3D prototype, or to see the updates on the M4A3!!

Rubicon Models

  • Administrator
  • Colonel
  • *****
  • Posts: 3,862
    • View Profile
Re: Codename: Sherman 16 - Updated 160523
« Reply #100 on: May 24, 2016, 12:05:03 am »
The 3D drawing looks great. I can't wait to see the 3D prototype, or to see the updates on the M4A3!!

This is going to be a long process!  We would like to get all the key components done before
the final update or create any new variants for the M4 war machine!
;)

Rubicon Models

  • Administrator
  • Colonel
  • *****
  • Posts: 3,862
    • View Profile
Re: Codename: Sherman 16 - Updated 160609
« Reply #101 on: June 09, 2016, 12:22:57 am »
Have to do it right the first time!  Bogie assembly, Horizontal Volute Spring System (HVSS) suspension...


Enjoy!
;)

ultravanillasmurf

  • Lieutenant
  • ****
  • Posts: 2,305
    • View Profile
    • Blog:
Re: Codename: Sherman 16 - Updated 160609
« Reply #102 on: June 09, 2016, 01:22:57 am »
Excellent.

Rubicon Models

  • Administrator
  • Colonel
  • *****
  • Posts: 3,862
    • View Profile
Re: Codename: Sherman 16 - Updated 160609
« Reply #103 on: June 24, 2016, 02:29:29 pm »
More work done on our M4 Digital Library...


Enjoy!
;)

Rubicon Models

  • Administrator
  • Colonel
  • *****
  • Posts: 3,862
    • View Profile
Re: Codename: Sherman 16 - Updated 160625
« Reply #104 on: June 25, 2016, 02:33:11 pm »
More studio news regarding our M4 Digital Library project - Tracks & Suspension are done!
By combining different sprockets, rear idler wheels, tracks and suspension, we can now have
different configurations for various Sherman variants anytime we need one!


Enjoy!
;)