Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Pinky

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 ... 116
46
General Discussions / Re: Which Sherman?
« on: May 04, 2019, 01:57:43 pm »
The most common type in Marine service up till 1945 was the M4A2.  They didn't choose it because it was diesel-powered, but because it was the only variant available (they preferred the M4A3 and M4).  Later, the Marines grew to like the diesel due to its higher torque.  They did use some M4A1s, but only in one campaign (New Britain).

M4A2s began entering Marine service in late 1943, starting with Tarawa.  Up until about August 1944 it was the small hatch type, with a low bustle turret.  From then onwards the large hatch version became more common.  By the time of the final Pacific War campaigns in 1945 (Iwo Jima and Okinawa), they were nearly all large hatch 75mm Shermans - only 3rd Tank Battalion had the older type.  However, by 1945 the M4A3 was replacing the M4A2, and the majority of Marine tanks in the final campaigns were large hatch M4A3s. 




47
General Discussions / Re: LVT(A)-4
« on: May 04, 2019, 12:16:33 pm »
IRC the ones assigned to the Navy were grey/ gray , the USMC ones green & camo

No, that's not correct.  All amtracs and amtanks were initially painted Ocean Grey.  However, this faded to a light blue and both the Army and Marines complained about it being too conspicuous once the vehicles were ashore. As a result, from May 1944 existing vehicles began to be repainted in Olive Drab and new vehicles were painted this colour in the factory.  In the interim, some units painted camo over the Ocean Grey (usually a sand colour).

LVT(A)-4s on Saipan were painted Ocean Grey (i.e. they went into action before the switchover to OD).  Army vehicles had quite prominent white stars, but Marine vehicles didn't. 

This is from Zaloga and Balin "US Amtracs and Amphibians at War 1941-45".

48
They had hinted something special for the up coming D-Day anniversary, and maybe now you gave then an idea.
Maybe now they are thinking about doing a warship of some type (a support ship at D-Day) project.

Not really - they don't seem to have any actual plans for a D-Day special.

Quote
I have read and understand why they started that big resin project. If Rubicon Models is looking for big, bigger, and biggest projects, why not something like a 1:56 scale  armored train?

That's a great idea.  And actually more useful than a siege gun, at least for wargaming.  Both German and Soviet trains would be very cool.

49
Showcase & Gallery / Re: RM Showcase: At the Crossroad 190501
« on: May 01, 2019, 07:26:50 pm »
Great work.  Especially the weathering.  It does look a bit as though the tank is charging into the prisoners...

50
Cool subject.  Usual reservations about metal and resin, but obviously has to be a limited production kit. 

51
General Discussions / Re: 75th anniversary of D-Day
« on: April 20, 2019, 06:07:09 pm »
A repackage of an existing kit, with some resin extras.  The DD Sherman is a good idea - maybe do the hull and collapsed skirts in one piece (no plastic M4A1 hull needed - add it to an M4 kit).  And maybe a wrecked Panzer, or bunker, in resin as a diorama base.

You could just repackage the landing craft and include a tank.

52
General Discussions / 75th anniversary of D-Day
« on: April 20, 2019, 11:19:09 am »
It seems hard to believe it, but it's now 75 years since the D-Day landings.  Does Rubicon have any plans for anything to commemorate it? 

53
No question about this one - definitely a great choice of subject.  The Red Army used them too. 

54
Work In Progress / Re: Bedford QL 3-ton Truck - 3D Prototype 190413
« on: April 17, 2019, 10:16:15 am »
I guess seated Commonwealth infantry could be Rubicon's next (presumably pewter) add-on.  It certainly looks like a more impressive model.

Seriously, I do wonder if Rubicon's researchers realised that the version that's under production is actually a supply vehicle.  British softskins are perhaps less well known than German and US types, and it'd be an easy mistake to make.

55
Work In Progress / Re: Bedford QL 3-ton Truck - 3D Prototype 190413
« on: April 14, 2019, 09:01:57 pm »
I think the original point was that the QLT will be far more popular.  Wargamers prefer troop transports to cargo carriers. 

56
Work In Progress / Re: Bedford QL 3-ton Truck - 3D Prototype 190413
« on: April 14, 2019, 12:02:53 am »
It looks great, but what about the point that was made earlier about this being a cargo vehicle not the troop carrier? 

57
General Discussions / Re: What's Warlord up to?
« on: April 12, 2019, 10:00:44 am »
Warlord have finally branched out into the Korean War (I think they put out a book last year, but now the models are appearing).  They appear to have sets of plastic Chinese and US infantry in the pipeline, as well as a couple of vehicles - and the characters from M*A*S*H: https://www.warlordgames.com/frontline-report-warlord-games-salute-2019/

The Centurion does not look good; I'm guessing it's resin.  I still think that this is an area that Rubicon should look at.  Starting with a couple of early post-war vehicles, like the Centurion and M46, and maybe a post-war version of the T-34/85.


58
Work In Progress / Re: M3A1 Scout Car - TS1 Plastic Painted 190404
« on: April 06, 2019, 11:17:11 am »
I'm not talking about the painting, Ripley - I'm referring to the way the hood overhangs the windscreen.  The join between the top and sides is also very prominent.  It's otherwise a great looking kit (few photos show the canopy in use anyway).

59
Work In Progress / Re: M3A1 Scout Car - TS1 Plastic Painted 190404
« on: April 05, 2019, 12:49:36 am »
Everything looks good apart from the canopy, which looks rather weird.  I guess mine will be open to the elements.

60
...and the Elefant:



Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 ... 116