Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Pinky

Pages: 1 ... 90 91 [92] 93 94 ... 116
1366
Work In Progress / Re: M10/M36 Tank Destroyer - Decal Sheet Design 151116
« on: November 16, 2015, 01:12:52 am »
Serial numbers do seem to be relatively uncommon on US Army M10s and M36s.  They were more common on the M36 than the M10, from what I can see.  The serial number was normally positioned on the hull side near the front. 

You probably don't need 4 of the tank destroyer battalion insignia (i.e. the black panther head) - 2 will do.

You've actually got two different (incomplete) sets of French unit markings there - the 'Cross of Lorraine' appeared vehicles of the Regiment blindes de Fusiliers Marins (all former French Navy personnel), while the 5th Armoured Division used the big white diamond on French colours.  French vehicles  had their own fancy serial number as well, painted in white on a black rectangle with the French flag on the left side.  This appeared on the front and rear.
 
Nice to see you've included the British registration numbers (with the 's' prefix, signifying a self-propelled gun).  The '51' in a red square wouldn't appear on a British M10 or Achilles - they were crewed by the Royal Artillery, which used a red over blue square (like the one with a '77' on it that you've provided, which is correct).

These vehicles were widely used by the anti-tank regiments of the British infantry divisions as well, so maybe include a few infantry division formation signs?  For the infantry, the regimental sign was also a red over blue square, but with a '46' inside.  The RA had very complicated additional markings, so maybe don't try and cover all of them.

If you need some space, you could ditch the stars with yellow circles (as they were only used for a short time) and the US armoured division patch (since, as previously discussed, this almost never appeared on vehicles)...

1367
Showcase & Gallery / Re: Panther Ausf. G and Grenadiers 1945
« on: November 14, 2015, 10:42:56 am »
Thanks for sharing this - your painting is excellent.  You've really captured the look of a tank that's survived several encounters.  The figures are well painted too.  One point - you need to remove your mould lines, as they undermine the appearance of your kit.  Especially on the tracks.

1368
http://www.wwpd.net/2015/11/bolt-action-review-rubcions-m5a1-stuart.html

Very positive reviews.  I agree with most of it; I haven't built my Crusader AA yet, but I've built the late M5A1 and M8.  They are both lovely kits.  The M5A1 kit has a couple of very minor fit issues (the hull hatches didn't quite fit), but builds into a great model.  The M8 is even better, in my view. 

1369
General Discussions / Re: Spiel and Crisis 2015 - Show Highlights 151108
« on: November 09, 2015, 04:50:09 pm »
That's a Perry admiring Rubicon's products.  Be interested to know what he said...

1370
Wish Lists / Re: British Tanks? What British Tanks?
« on: November 08, 2015, 10:50:47 am »
Hey, I read it.  Your BEF Matilda looks very convincing.  I had a poke around your site - very entertaining.  You have the same grasshopper-like tendencies as me when it comes to finishing projects...

1371
Work In Progress / Re: Digital Sculpts - Updated 151102
« on: November 06, 2015, 04:24:13 pm »
Given that these figures are not naturally proportioned, but are proportioned along the usual 28m "heroic" lines, I think it's a bit irrelevant whether they measure up exactly to 1/56 scale vehicles (most 28mm figures are oversize, which is why many players prefer 1/48 scale vehicles).  I think it's more important that they look good next to the most commonly used 28mm figures, even if they're slightly different looking. 

1372
Wish Lists / Re: British Tanks? What British Tanks?
« on: November 03, 2015, 10:04:01 pm »
It would be quite a squeeze to get all the bits on four sprues, but it might be possible to arrange it so an AVRE could be built from three and have a later kit with an additional sprue for some of the bolt on toys (dozer, fascine, bobbin etc.).

Agreed.  I think it's doable - look at Rubicon's Tiger I, which is a large vehicle but includes a lot of options.  And Rubicon have had a lot of experience in kit design since then.

Quote
I think Pinky is right that a Matilda II kit could could cover the whole life of the design, though providing both high heels and flats would require ingenuity.

Do you mean the raised suspension that featured on some BEF A12s?  This wasn't standard, and could be ignored.

Quote
They were still in Australian service in the fifties, I think in Civil Defence. An interesting decal option.

Until about 1955.  Not bad for a tank designed in 1938.  That actually makes it one of the few tanks to see service throughout WW2.  I dunno how important the Australian market is, but Rubicon saw fit to include Aussie markings for their Crusader. 

1373
Wish Lists / Re: British Tanks? What British Tanks?
« on: November 03, 2015, 10:10:02 am »
The Matilda and Valentine both have a relatively narrow appeal.  Of the two, the Matilda II would probably be more popular, because it featured prominently in the early part of the North African campaign and also played a role in the Fall of France (with the BEF), the Eastern Front (with the Soviets, although not very successfully) and the Pacific (the Australians used them up to the end of the war).  It would probably be possible for Rubicon to provide all the parts to build the various versions (there were a number of modifications over its service life, and there was a close support version and a flamethrower version).

I think a Churchill would be far more popular, especially if there was an AVRE version included.

1374
Work In Progress / Re: Digital Sculpts - Updated 151102
« on: November 03, 2015, 12:46:30 am »
Could we see them next to a built and painted Warlord plastic German?

1375
Wish Lists / Re: British Tanks? What British Tanks?
« on: November 02, 2015, 12:55:22 pm »
there was never a Sherman 2 firefly, as far as I can tell.
the sherman 1 hybrid would be ok, but a Sherman 1 would be ok as a firefly.
a Sherman 5 would be best imho!
of course italeri/warlord do a Sherman 1 so doing the same type would be daft, so go for a mk5 lots of conversion potential

No, you're right - there was no Sherman IIc (it seems uncertain whether 'Firefly was an official name). 

I like the look of the Sherman Ic hybrid, and I thought if Rubicon could squeeze in both the original Sherman I hull and the hybrid hull, plus the Firefly upgrade, it would be a versatile kit. 

1376
Work In Progress / Re: Digital Sculpts - Updated 151029
« on: October 30, 2015, 12:25:57 am »
Warlord figures are very squat looking - almost dwarf-like.  They also tend to be posed 'heroically' (i.e. with their legs apart and knees bent).  Tamiya figures (which are too big anyway) all have legs like catwalk models, so ignore them.  The Perry figures seem to be a better template.  I don't think your figures should be any taller than the Perry figures.  Maybe slightly smaller than the "100%" version?

1377
Wish Lists / Re: British Tanks? What British Tanks?
« on: October 26, 2015, 09:29:09 pm »
I'm also hoping Rubicon turn their attention to those subjects.  I don't mind which Sherman it is, provided it has the option of being built as a Firefly.  Which means a Sherman I, Sherman II or Sherman V...

1378
Work In Progress / Re: Digital Sculpts - Various 151024
« on: October 25, 2015, 09:41:19 am »
I use Tamiya liquid cement to assemble my Rubicon kits, and it works fine (my Revell cement didn't).  But when I tried attaching Tamiya accessories to my Rubicon vehicles, the bond was very poor - they don't melt together properly.

1379
Work In Progress / Re: Digital Sculpts - Various 151024
« on: October 25, 2015, 12:33:57 am »
I have one concern about the figures that are being planned, and this comes back to the plastic that Rubicon uses.  It's not as easy to work with as Warlord's, and (as I've pointed out a few times), Rubicon's plastic doesn't bond with other manufacturers' (e.g. Warlord/Italeri, or Tamiya).  This potentially limits the scope for conversion - and one of the joys of this scale is converting the figures.  Anyone else have any thoughts on this?

1380
Work In Progress / Re: Digital Sculpts - Various 151024
« on: October 24, 2015, 02:30:53 pm »
I like his relaxed pose - looks very authentic. 

Pages: 1 ... 90 91 [92] 93 94 ... 116