Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - ultravanillasmurf

Pages: 1 ... 82 83 [84] 85 86 ... 154
1246
I only entered the hobby in 1984 and (as you might guess) live in the UK, so they are brands I had never heard of.

Interesting timeline here:http://www-personal.umich.edu/~beattie/timeline2.html

"20mm" has an interesting history, which is mentioned in passing in the above link. There is a reference to HO (also known as 3.5mm to the foot) as the US figures.

Due to (traditionally) United Kingdom railways having a smaller loading gauge than Continental railways it was not possible to get the mechanism into the 1/87 scale body shells (this version is occasionally disputed, though it is also repeated for N Gauge). The choice was made to use the scale of 4mm to the foot (or 1/76 scale), also known as OO gauge (which is 16.5mm gauge but 4mm to the foot scale - so narrow gauge of four foot one and half inches).

That means that the UK small figures (Airfix branded their figures as HO/OO but were 1/76) were bigger than true HO at 1/87.

A man 20mm tall is about five foot eight inches in HO, but only five foot in OO.

Of course the additional confusion of 1/72 scale (which I guess is the equivalent of US O Gauge scale of 1/48 due to US modellers not wanting to mix measurement systems) which requires a figure between 24 to 25mm to the top of the head.

Model railway wise the next scale is S Gauge at 1/64 scale which traditionally in the UK is thought to be 25mm scale.

I remember the Twilight 2000 figures being tiny compared to the Platoon 20 figures because the former were 1/87.




1247
Work In Progress / Re: Codename: Sherman 2016 - Decals for the M4 171129
« on: December 03, 2017, 02:57:42 am »
The Sherman III sheet has the 33rd Armoured Brigade Diablo and the First Northamptonshire Yeomanry tactical sign (up to August 1944). With some judicious application of mud (or a steady hand and some white paint) it will also get you the two RAC regiments.

So I will have to buy as many Sherman IIIs as Sherman Is. Cunning marketing ^__^.

Maybe they’ll release them in blister packs like the German ones?
They are supplying both sheets in the M4 box!

Most excellent!

1248
Yay!

Thanks.

1249
I remember figure heights as always being ground to eyes because you could not see the top of the head, especially if said figure was wearing a shako.

I have a large collection of GZG 25mm figures.

1250
Work In Progress / Re: New Scenic Range - More Fence Info 171126
« on: December 02, 2017, 10:19:29 pm »
I wonder if Rubicon are using the fences as an exercise, both to see if there is a market and for new staff.

As they have noted, the main bottle neck is the mould production. This is far simpler than the slide mould required for the track.

The Pak 40 is listed for quarter 4 (okay that will probably overrun) but would be unaffected by any design work they are doing now.

1251
Certainly going to be popular, if previous posts are to be believed.

1252
Work In Progress / Re: Codename: Sherman 2016 - Decals for the M4 171129
« on: November 30, 2017, 05:41:10 pm »
The Sherman III sheet has the 33rd Armoured Brigade Diablo and the First Northamptonshire Yeomanry tactical sign (up to August 1944). With some judicious application of mud (or a steady hand and some white paint) it will also get you the two RAC regiments.

So I will have to buy as many Sherman IIIs as Sherman Is. Cunning marketing ^__^.

1253
Work In Progress / Re: Codename: Sherman 2016 - Decals for the M4 171129
« on: November 30, 2017, 05:04:56 pm »
Last minute research - Sherman I June 1944 Normandy.

The Oliver book states 79th Armoured Division (First Army Tank Brigade), 33rd Armoured Brigade and the ARG.

On the other hand there were just two Sherman ICs listed in the Oliver book but I am sure there are some amongst the plates in the Fortin book.

1254
Work In Progress / Re: Codename: Sherman 2016 - Decals for the M4 171129
« on: November 30, 2017, 04:56:30 pm »
Thanks Ripley.

My comment was just general, the M4 was used by Commonwealth forces but there are no markings for them. I understand that it is impossible to cover everything.  As an aside, I have seven sets of Warlord M4 decal sheets unused, I used a couple of numbers off one sheet on the flame fougasse markers.

I have not done the research on who was using M4s in Normandy (not the Guards tank division which is how my Warlord M4s are marked).

Probably there will be suitable division and tactical signs on the Sherman III sheets.

I have a Warlord registration number sheet I am working my way through.

1255
Work In Progress / Re: Codename: Sherman 2016 - Decals for the M4 171129
« on: November 30, 2017, 04:40:20 am »
Hmmm, I would want the M4 as tanks, but then would need the Sherman IC sheet for the decals.

1256
Work In Progress / Re: New Scenic Range - More Fence Info 171126
« on: November 27, 2017, 01:41:21 am »
Is anyone else going to martini the British infantry?
?

Over the page.

Are they home grown figures?

Slapped wrist for holding the magazine.

The helmet looks small.

1257
Wish Lists / Who do you want to see?
« on: November 24, 2017, 09:03:16 pm »
Having watched The Death of Stalin, I wondered about a Jason Isaacs version of Zhukov.



Another would be a certain Canadian actor playing a tank commander with a positive attitude.

So who else would you like to see? Historical or theatrical.

1258
Work In Progress / Re: The Panzer IV Digital Library - Stowage! 171124
« on: November 24, 2017, 04:30:27 pm »
A good idea.

Ripley makes some good points.

Water bottles seemed popular in groups.

I will dig out the photograph reference in the Osprey book

1259
General Discussions / Re: My very first Rubicon Models.
« on: November 23, 2017, 10:27:33 pm »
I will have to start a new post in the "Showcase & Gallery" if anyone is interested in seeing my completed kits.
Definitely.


1260
It's awesome model :-) Is there any chance for Allied UK/Commonwealth version?
Do you mean the M5 half track?
There are threads mentioning this here:
http://forum.rubiconmodels.com/index.php?topic=495.msg5063#msg5063
http://forum.rubiconmodels.com/index.php?topic=445.msg5609#msg5609
http://forum.rubiconmodels.com/index.php?topic=132.msg4447#msg4447

Yes, your right :-) It's M5 I'm talking about (and possibly M15/M16 if you'd be so kind to release for it any upgrade kits ;-) ) but I can't refrein myself of mentioning that you've never make any comment on possible M5 (and derivatives) in any of these topics :-)
Hi, Rubicon mentioned this back in January.
This model looks great. Is there any chance for M5 Commonwealth variant?

There are currently just too many vehicles (projects) to do right now.  Since we already
have a M3, we had to put the M5 on hold for a while.

Pages: 1 ... 82 83 [84] 85 86 ... 154