Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - elias.tibbs

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 15
31
Work In Progress / Re: New Scenic Range - More Fence Info 171126
« on: December 12, 2017, 05:25:47 AM »
To be fair my cousin’s farm in Poland has similar fences.

32
General Discussions / Re: Q4/17 New Releases - Is now 4 weeks away! 171209
« on: December 10, 2017, 04:52:29 AM »
I sense another 18 shermans in my future.

33
Work In Progress / Re: Codename: Sherman 2016 - Decals for the M4 171129
« on: December 03, 2017, 02:33:33 AM »
The Sherman III sheet has the 33rd Armoured Brigade Diablo and the First Northamptonshire Yeomanry tactical sign (up to August 1944). With some judicious application of mud (or a steady hand and some white paint) it will also get you the two RAC regiments.

So I will have to buy as many Sherman IIIs as Sherman Is. Cunning marketing ^__^.

Maybe they’ll release them in blister packs like the German ones?

34
I prefer the Perry and Rubicon scale, and I’m a gamer before a modeller.

35
Work In Progress / Re: New Scenic Range - More Fence Info 171126
« on: November 27, 2017, 03:20:54 AM »
They do appear to be. They look like Rubicon’s bases too.

36
Work In Progress / Re: New Scenic Range - More Fence Info 171126
« on: November 26, 2017, 11:03:55 PM »
Is anyone else going to mention the British infantry?

Sprues look great though.

37
Work In Progress / Re: New Scenic Range - Log & Picket Fence 171124
« on: November 26, 2017, 06:01:32 PM »
I’m sure most things will be covered eventually

38
General Discussions / Re: Should I get the old Panzer IV kit?
« on: November 21, 2017, 06:59:20 AM »
More depending on what you want it for. Tabletop gaming, do either. More historically accurate one with more part, wait.

Or do both.

39
M15 and M16 has different bodies, so would need more bits

40
General Discussions / Re: Should I get the old Panzer IV kit?
« on: November 20, 2017, 09:55:32 PM »
What pinky said.

41
Work In Progress / Re: Codename: Sherman 2016 - M4A2 Sprue Layout 171114
« on: November 17, 2017, 05:29:59 PM »
Yeah, considering that the US only took delivery of six M4A2 76(w), it did seem strange to have US crew. That said, they would needed to have created a brand new spruce for the Russians and I understand the costs and stuff.

42
Work In Progress / Re: Codename: Sherman 2016 - M4 Hybrid 171105
« on: November 08, 2017, 05:38:09 AM »
My plan is a US brigade.. just need Rubicon to do Chaffees to finish it off though.

Then do one of each variant on top of that.

43
Work In Progress / Re: Codename: Sherman 2016 - M4 Hybrid 171105
« on: November 06, 2017, 09:56:48 PM »
One of each? And every variant? No? Just me?

44
General Discussions / Re: Q4 New Releases - Which Models?
« on: October 31, 2017, 02:34:56 PM »
US infantry

45
Wish Lists / Re: Tiger II?
« on: October 17, 2017, 01:44:34 AM »
Either downscale italieri or upscaled PSC for the vast majority.

Although italieri have made some purpose built kits at 1/56 and I heard there's a company called AK models making 1/56 for them too (I believe they do some of PSCs kits)

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 15